Child Welfare League of America Making Children a National Priority

 

Child Welfare League of America Making Children a National Priority
About Us
CWLA
Special Initiatives
CWLA
Advocacy
CWLA
Membership
CWLA
News and Media Center
CWLA
Programs
CWLA
Research and Data
CWLA
Publications
CWLA
Conferences and Training
CWLA
Culture and Diversity
CWLA
Consultation
CWLA
Support CWLA
CWLA Members Only Content
       
 

Home > Practice Areas > Family Foster Care > Other Links and Resources

 
 

Appendix I: Individual Analyses of State Policies

Key Factors
Family Foster Care
Agency Policy/Regulations

Texas
Report on Residential Child Care Licensing Program (RCCL)
Abuse Investigations in CPS-Verified Foster Homes

Does the policy address foster care as a separate type of investigation?
  • Yes, a separate policy is given for foster homes and facilities.
Is kinship/relative care addressed in the policy?
  • No language in the report addresses kinship/relative care.
What agency/unit is mandated to conduct the investigation?
  • The State Residential Child Care Licensing Program (RCCL) conducts the investigation.
Is there a team approach? Who is on the team?
  • Yes, RCCL staff rely on the CPS foster/adoptive placement (FAD) workers to conduct activities necessary to assure the safety of children. These activities include implementing initial safety plans, placing children, or transporting them to an interview with the RCCL investigator.

  • FAD workers are included in the investigation and in the interviews with foster parents and have the role of supporting the foster parents. Including the FAD worker is optional, however, not mandatory.

  • When criminal matters are involved, RCCL staff are mandated to report to law enforcement and to work with law enforcement staff.

  • In situations in which both foster and biological children are reported, RCCL staff conduct joint investigations with CPS investigators. Clarity is lacking about which worker should take the lead in those joint investigations.
What are the key activities of agency staff?

  • Initial safety plans are put in place. The plan usually assures that the alleged perpetrator does not have access to the child until an initial assessment of safety can be made. The plan may involve having the foster parent who is the alleged perpetrator leave the foster home or "even having child placement agency staff stay in the home." This appears to be a temporary measure until the investigator can visit the foster home to assure safety. RCCL staff can compel, if necessary, the placement agency to complete the safety plan. The plan could also include removal. The safety plan seems to be a stopgap measure to achieve safety until the investigation commences. Some tension occurs between RCCL staff and CPS staff concerning their interaction around these activities.

  • Standard investigative techniques described in the report include interviewing the child victim, collaterals, and the alleged perpetrators. Most interviews are audiotaped. There is close coordination with law enforcement as appropriate.

  • Private agencies cannot receive completed investigation reports, although they receive a letter regarding the results. Public agency staff have access to the report on the management information system.
What time frames are identified?
  • On high-risk cases, a 24-hour response is expected. Initial contacts are consistently made within the required timeframes of RCCL policy. The timeframes for first contact in both CPS and RCCL vary by report priority.

  • The policy in the RCCL handbook states that the investigation is to be completed by the caseworker in 45 days, and a supervisor is to sign off on the investigation in 60 days. Timeliness in closing the case within 60 days has been an issue for RCCL.
What decisionmaking processes are described?
  • RCCL makes investigative decisions.
  • CPS makes child placement decisions.
Is the CPS/licensing interface clear?
  • The licensing agency conducts the investigation. Investigators make CPS determinations and also note any possible issues related to compliance with licensing standards.
What actions are taken regarding the reported child(ren) during the investigation?
  • The RCCL investigator assesses safety of the reported child.

  • RCCL does not do formal risk assessment (by using a formal tool). RCCL workers investigate reports and do not assess future risk. Assessment of future risk is the CPS worker's responsibility.

  • CPS worker is responsible for addressing the safety needs of reported child.
What actions are taken regarding other children in the home?
  • The RCCL investigator assesses the safety of other children in home.
  • CPS is responsible for addressing the safety needs of other children in the home.
What actions are taken to protect the rights of foster parents throughout the process?
  • Alleged perpetrators have access to an administrative review process.

  • Alleged perpetrators have access to independent review in a State Office Administrative Hearing.
What supports are provided to foster parents throughout the process?
  • The FAD (CPS agency placement worker) participates in the investigation with the primary role of supporting the foster parents through the process.

  • Originally, there was a trend to send FAD (placement) workers who did not have responsibility for the foster family, but RCCL advocated for the FAD worker who had a relationship with the family so that they could provide more support.
Commentary

This information comes from an informative report that reviews a transition, in Texas, from CPS staff investigating abuse/neglect in CPS foster homes to the RCCL staff investigating it. This practice began in 1999. Previously, RCCL was responsible for the investigation of maltreatment in private agency foster homes, while state CPS workers were responsible for CPS-verified foster families. RCCL has 16 investigators who investigate CPS cases and cover regions. They are very experienced investigators who have extensive CPS experience. Foster parent associations advocated for this change because the RCCL process:
  • Uses a higher standard of evidence to support investigations;

  • Provides appeals processes within the agency and outside through an independent State Office Administrative Hearing.

  • Allows for greater objectivity than when investigations were done by local CPS staff who may have prior knowledge and interest in both the foster home and the reported child.
Some tension has been suggested, between RCCL investigators and CPS workers, as to whether RCCL investigators should be responsible for risk-assessment activities.

Supplemental Materials
  • The Texas summary primarily addresses state-operated child placing agencies. It does not reflect the state's relationship with private facilities which make up the bulk of the 13,000 placements of children in the state.



 Back to Top   Printer-friendly Page Printer-friendly Page   Contact Us Contact Us

 
 

 

 


About Us | Special Initiatives | Advocacy | Membership | News & Media Center | Practice Areas | Support CWLA
Research/Data | Publications | Webstore | Conferences/Training | Culture/Diversity | Consultation/Training

All Content and Images Copyright Child Welfare League of America. All Rights Reserved.
See also Legal Information, Privacy Policy, Browser Compatibility Statement

CWLA is committed to providing equal employment opportunities and access for all individuals.
No employee, applicant for employment, or member of the public shall be discriminated against
on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, or
any other personal characteristic protected by federal, state, or local law.